I was flipping around TV channels the other day, and believe I came across a new idol. There were thousands of people gathered in a stadium screaming hysterically at what they apparently perceived as some sort of messianic figure onstage speaking to them. Acts included spastic gyration is the aisles, uncontrollable sobbing, and most disturbingly some women rushing the stage and throwing themselves at him as if he was John Lennon reincarnated (1960's model). By now, I'm guessing the reader thinks the channel was on TBN while either Benny Hinn or Rod Parsley perform b-level hypnosis on their followers. Or perhaps I was watching the likes of David Archuleta or a Backstreet Boys reunion on MTV. Anyone thinking either of these scenarios would be mistaken. I was watching a Barack Obama rally.
As many people have pointed out, these rally's are beginning to take on a life of their own. In addition to being fanatical group of worshipers presently residing in this country, they are also the most difficult to deal with. I didn't understand why the Hillary supporters were having such a difficult time jumping on board Senator Obama's campaign once he had the nomination locked up until I started interacting with some of them. Having a rational conversation with an Obama supporter is like trying to read War and Peace to a Guantanamo detainee who is undergoing his 83rd hour without sleep. In other words, it's impossible. Trying to reason with them is about as easy as it is with the fanatics mentioned in the first paragraph of this blog.
What's even more frightening about this is that I've made it clear in this blog that given the primary choices of presidential candidates in this election, I think Obama is the best candidate. Of course there is no way I'd vote for him (I've already written in Ron Paul's name on my ballot). My support of Obama is more a result of the Republican party showing their incompetence by nominating Senator McCain as their candidate. Later, McCain confirmed their suspected incompetence by choosing Governor Palin as his running mate. FWIW, I've predicted that whoever the next president is, that they will go down as the worst in this country's history. I believe either one of them will be equally inept, and both of there economic plans will have us $50 trillion in debt by the year 2030.
Getting back to the Obama fanaticism, his support transcends any known logic I can comprehend. For example, I'm a teamster (because my job requires it) and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that many of Obama's positions are, at the root, anti-union relative to some of the other candidates. This is confirmed when the list of his campaign contributers is revealed (pro-labor accounts for very little of his nearly $600 million in contributions) and the socialistic bailout that he lobbied so hard for. Incidently, it comes as no surprise that Wall Street firms make up the majority of his contributions. Given these facts, you'll never guess who was on the cover of the most recent Teamster magazine. In fact, teamster President Jimmy hoffa says in the latest article, "... the unprecedented $700 billion (actually closer to $850 billion) bailout of Wall Street has left many on Main Street without help. Guess who was one of the biggest proponents of the bailout, Jimmy? Makes about as much sense as them endorsing Al Gore. Oh wait...
This isn't to say that the other side isn't without it's own hypocracy. Christian churches and ministries all over the country are struggling in today's economic climate. Given those facts, one of the things that is being preached is financial responsibility. This is not only sound biblical advice, but it also helps these people get their 10% of Joe the Plumber's paycheck. Given this, it would seem logical these groups would endorse a candidate that embodies this value. Amazingly, they mostly endorse Senator John "I love the Wall Street bailout as much as Obama" McCain. Without going too far down this rabbit trail, I could go on and on about the numerous sellouts in this country jumping onboard with either Obama or McCain not because they like them, but because they are terrified of being left in the cold when one of them wins. The bottom line is that when their contributions are analyzed along with their voting record, it's pretty obvious that neither of these guys gives a rip about the people on Main Street or Joe the Plumber. They are both loyal to $, and none of it is coming from either of these sources.
As for the election coming up this Tuesday, I'm anticipating a couple possible scenario's. Zogby (the most reputable poll, IMO) currently shows Obama with an 8 point lead in a nationwide poll. Part of me is wondering how accurate that poll really is given the presence of the less than pleasant Obama supporters out there. For me personally, I am unwilling to tell someone how I will (or have) voted in this election unless I can be certain that it can be followed by a logical and rational conversation. In other words, I wouldn't be a bit surprised that many of the people who say they are voting for Obama or are undecided are possibly trying to save themselves a potential headache. It certainly beats having to listen to Matt Damon, Bill Maher, or any of his other worshipers telling me how stupid I am for not voting for him. I'd rather Matt started pre production on The Talented Mr. Ripley 2: Electric Boogaloo. Bill Maher has confined himself to a lifestyle dope smoking and hot tubbing. More power to him, but it would an understatement to say that neither one of these guys speaks for me. If living Maher's lifestyle and giving Obama my endorsement makes me intelligent, then I want to be dumb.
Of course there is a possibility that this election will share elements of Bobby Jindal's first bid to become Governor of Louisiana. For anyone who isn't aware of what happened, Jindal had a comfortable lead heading into the election only to lose it. Among the reasons given for this upset was the possibility of voter's not being voting for someone whose parents were both Native Punjabi Indians. In other words, racism could be a factor in what I perceive will be final popular vote as much closer than 8 points.
Regardless of what happens November 4th, a new megachurch has been born. Obama's followers have elevated him to a status on par with TBN celebrity or American Idol. Unfortunately for either of these candidates, it's going to take some substance to fix this mess. We might have to wait until 2012 for that.
Saturday, November 1, 2008
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Shark Jumping Anyone?
While Senator Clinton has made it known for awhile that she plans on being President one day, I've been skeptical of her ability to serve the United States in this capacity for a number of reasons. As pathetic as it may sound, her un-Presidential smirks during Bush's State of the Union Addresses were what initially tipped me off to this. The smirk was in response to President Bush making a joke about him and former President Clinton being his father's two favorite baby boomers. Regardless of what anyone thinks of any U.S. President in history, I believe they all deserve a certain level of respect. After all, they are our elected leaders (althougth some may argue that point). If they aren't worthy of this, then logically no one is. In doing this, I believe she not only showed contempt for this highest of offices, but opened the door for anyone to treat her the same way should she someday attain the same position. Her inability was further shown when she recalled the sniper fire that came her way when landing in Bosnia. Video shown of the event proved this to be untrue.
As embarrassing as these events may or may not have been, I believe Senator Clinton's political career jumped the shark with her recent comments of why she is staying in the race. In referring to her husbands campaign in 1992, she referrenced the fact that he didn't wrap up the nomination until the California primary in June of that year. Seeing how the primary schedule in 2008 is much different than when her husband initially ran, this is obviously a straw man arguement. Next, she recalled the tragic assasination of Senator Robert Kennedy in 1968 which led to Humphrey's nomination. I'd put this right up there with teamates discussing their pitcher's no-hitter or wear shoes into a Japanese home.
For those of you who don't know, the term "Jumping the Shark" is generally used when something special has lost its credibility. It refers to an episode of Happy Days in which Fonzie puts on his leather jacket while water skiing, and jumps over a shark.
It could certainly be argued that I'm being too hard on the Senator for New York, but the desperation behind her justification of the statements I think put an end to any serious political aspirations she has.
For the record, I hold her in the highest respect. All of my criticisms of her are relative to her goals. I say this as someone who is on the other side of many of her opinions. At the very least, she is worthy of respect. Regardless of whether or not she is able to give it.
Friday, May 16, 2008
Buzz Bissinger vs. Balls Deep
For anyone who regularly watches Costas Now, the title of this blog is fairly self-explanatory. For anyone else, it is a reference to an hour and a half show that was taped on April 29th of this year. Numerous topics were covered during the course of the show, often with hilarious results.
During one of the segments, the advant of internet blogs was discussed. If you are not offended by strong language, the portion of the show can be seen here. Among other things, Bissinger attacks Leitch & his Deadspin blog for being glib, gossipy, profane, and poorly written. Unfortunately Bissinger's profane accusation falls on deaf ears due to his own choice of language. In light of everything Bissinger said, though, throwing the baby out with the bath water would be a huge disservice to the actual issue.
I quit listening to sports talk radio more than 10 years ago, and rarely converse with fans online due to its profane and negative nature. At the risk of sounding holier than thou, my simple reason for doing this is that it holds no appeal for me. Among other things, I have a very difficult time separating engaging in something like that from living it out in my personal life, so I simply try to avoid it.
In terms of Bissinger's concerns about online blogs slowly taking over the sports media, I honestly do not see that happening anytime soon. To start with, a majority of online information that I read links the "old media" as their primary source. In other words, no "old media" means no online media. Anyone who has ever read any of my blogs can tell that most, if not all, of the information that I communicate comes through media outlets that have direct access to the people or teams that I am writing about. My only complaint is that the links that I provide normally do not tell enough of the story they are reporting, or they fail to ask some of the tough questions that need to be addressed. I'm not exactly sure what the reasons behind this are.
With high school football I suspect most of the prep beat writers are not only spread out pretty thin with the amount of sports they cover, they some of them also may lack enthusiasm about the sport themselves (perhaps they're waiting for the beat writer for the mariners to retire). I don't know what the reason is behind the sport of boxing. The only thing I can think of is that some of the writers are institutionalized. Whatever the reason is, there can be little doubt that the access, professionalism, and quality of writing allows them to surpass anything that I do. If any professional writer decided that they wanted to tackle the issues I do, this blog would gladly cease to exhist.
I touched on it earlier, but I want to reemphasize how valuable it is for the media to have access to the people. Part of what made Mary Lou Retton's gold medal in 1984 so memorable was Rick Reilly being savvy enough to sneak in and rub elbows with Bela Karolyi while he was encouraging the young gymnast. I think it goes without saying that cystic fibrosis research wouldn't be where it is today if not for Gary Smith's phenomenal article on the Esiason family. Personally I cannot express any passion about the intricacies that have taken place on the field of play without first tipping my cap to people like Frank Deford and Bud Greenspan who romanticized it in the first place.
If the next generation of sports fans chooses to get their their news from Balls Deep's of the world, then the sports world will lose me as a fan. I deserve better, and so do the athletes.
During one of the segments, the advant of internet blogs was discussed. If you are not offended by strong language, the portion of the show can be seen here. Among other things, Bissinger attacks Leitch & his Deadspin blog for being glib, gossipy, profane, and poorly written. Unfortunately Bissinger's profane accusation falls on deaf ears due to his own choice of language. In light of everything Bissinger said, though, throwing the baby out with the bath water would be a huge disservice to the actual issue.
I quit listening to sports talk radio more than 10 years ago, and rarely converse with fans online due to its profane and negative nature. At the risk of sounding holier than thou, my simple reason for doing this is that it holds no appeal for me. Among other things, I have a very difficult time separating engaging in something like that from living it out in my personal life, so I simply try to avoid it.
In terms of Bissinger's concerns about online blogs slowly taking over the sports media, I honestly do not see that happening anytime soon. To start with, a majority of online information that I read links the "old media" as their primary source. In other words, no "old media" means no online media. Anyone who has ever read any of my blogs can tell that most, if not all, of the information that I communicate comes through media outlets that have direct access to the people or teams that I am writing about. My only complaint is that the links that I provide normally do not tell enough of the story they are reporting, or they fail to ask some of the tough questions that need to be addressed. I'm not exactly sure what the reasons behind this are.
With high school football I suspect most of the prep beat writers are not only spread out pretty thin with the amount of sports they cover, they some of them also may lack enthusiasm about the sport themselves (perhaps they're waiting for the beat writer for the mariners to retire). I don't know what the reason is behind the sport of boxing. The only thing I can think of is that some of the writers are institutionalized. Whatever the reason is, there can be little doubt that the access, professionalism, and quality of writing allows them to surpass anything that I do. If any professional writer decided that they wanted to tackle the issues I do, this blog would gladly cease to exhist.
I touched on it earlier, but I want to reemphasize how valuable it is for the media to have access to the people. Part of what made Mary Lou Retton's gold medal in 1984 so memorable was Rick Reilly being savvy enough to sneak in and rub elbows with Bela Karolyi while he was encouraging the young gymnast. I think it goes without saying that cystic fibrosis research wouldn't be where it is today if not for Gary Smith's phenomenal article on the Esiason family. Personally I cannot express any passion about the intricacies that have taken place on the field of play without first tipping my cap to people like Frank Deford and Bud Greenspan who romanticized it in the first place.
If the next generation of sports fans chooses to get their their news from Balls Deep's of the world, then the sports world will lose me as a fan. I deserve better, and so do the athletes.
Sunday, May 11, 2008
Christians Voting For Obama?
That's what this article reports, and given the last 28 years I can't say that I'm surprised.
I'm of the opinion that the Republicans who have been in office have taken a pro-life stance for the primary purpose of gaining votes. I say this because since 1980 a majority of the Presidents have professed this belief (including the current one), yet have done nothing about it.
Personally, I'm embarrassed to say that Obama would get my vote if my only choices were McCain, Clinton, and him. Seeing how I haven't voted for either a Democrat or a Republican Presidential candidate in over 10 years, I'd say his chances of breaking this trend are minimal. We'll see come November!
I'm of the opinion that the Republicans who have been in office have taken a pro-life stance for the primary purpose of gaining votes. I say this because since 1980 a majority of the Presidents have professed this belief (including the current one), yet have done nothing about it.
Personally, I'm embarrassed to say that Obama would get my vote if my only choices were McCain, Clinton, and him. Seeing how I haven't voted for either a Democrat or a Republican Presidential candidate in over 10 years, I'd say his chances of breaking this trend are minimal. We'll see come November!
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Boxing! How Low Can You Go.
The title is a play on words to an old Public Enemy song, that I believe is very descriptive of the fight between Roy Jones Jr. and Felix Trinidad this weekend. I really don't know why I even bother following the sport when it features garbage like this. Both fighters are well past their prime (especially Tito), and the victor will prove nothing except for the fact that he has aged less.
To boot, HBO is featuring this fight. They are, without question, the standard in which the boxing world is judged. If you're fighting on HBO, then you are the best. That's pretty disgusting.
If either of these guys were to fight any of the top fighters in their respective divisions they would not last the distance. Pavlik would have Trinidad out of there inside of 3 rounds, and Jones wouldn't last 10 rounds with Dawson. For the record, Jones is bigger, stronger, and faster than Trinidad. The fight will end whenever Roy wants it to end.
Anyone who knows me is aware of how disgusted I am with the entire orgination of the sport. Below are a couple of ficticious conversations I wrote 7-8 months ago expressing some of my frusterations. Since then, I have only become moreso.
I was riding the bus recently, and had a fascinating conversation with an average sports fan. If I had to guess, I’d say some of you will probably have a hard time believing this conversation ever took place for several reasons. The first of course is that I never ride the bus. Second of all I would imagine most of you would find it hard to believe that we would have so many facts memorized during the course of this conversation. And lastly, most of the people reading this probably know that I’m an introvert for the most part and that even if I was riding a bus it isn’t very likely that I’d really talk to anyone. I’m sure some of you could probably think of a few other reasons as well. Anyways, here it is!
Me: Hey, man. Do you mind if I sit here?
Sports Fan (SF): Go right ahead.
Me: Oh, you’re reading the sports section. Do you like sports?
SF: Yes I do. I’m too busy to follow it too closely, but I enjoy watching pretty much any sports event that’s on TV.
Me: Are you looking forward to the De La Hoya – Mayweather fight in May?
SF: Didn’t know they were fighting. I doubt I’ll watch it. Isn’t Mayweather getting old? I remember watching him fight Julio Cesar Chavez (CBS) and Pernell Whitaker (ABC) about 20 years ago.
Me: No, you’re thinking of his uncle, Roger. He hung up the gloves about 7-8 years ago. De La Hoya is fighting his nephew, Pretty Boy Floyd.
SF: I’ve never heard of him. Who has he fought recently?
Me: Well, he fought Carlos Baldomir last November on HBO and Zab Judah about a year ago on pay per view.
SF: That’s probably why I’ve never heard of him. I don’t pay to watch boxing. Especially if I’ve never heard of them. Who’s the guy he’s fighting, De La Hoya? His first name is Oscar, right?
Me: Yes it is.
SF: I haven’t heard anything about him in years. I watched him win a gold medal in Barcelona, some of his early fights on ESPN. It seems like I remember him fighting some guy in Stateline, Nevada on ABC. The reason I remember it is because you could see Bruce Willis sitting ringside the whole fight. What’s he done since then?
Me: Well, he’s had a pretty solid career. He’s beaten a lot good fighters like Pernell Whitaker, Julio Cesar Chavez, Ike Quartey, Fernando Vargas, and Felix Strum. He’s lost some controversial fights to Shane Mosely and Felix Trinidad. Of course a lot of people, including myself, didn’t think he beat Whitaker or Strum. He did get knocked out by Bernard Hopkins, though.
SF: My goodness! I can’t believe missed all of his fights! What channel were they on?
Me: Uh, they were all on pay per view.
SF: Man, what is it with all these fights suddenly being on pay per view? I remember watching a lot of great fights on network TV. I’m pretty sure I saw both Leonard-Duran fights on ABC, Tommy Hearns and Duran fought on CBS. De La Hoya and Mayweather can’t be any better than those fighters can they?
Me: No, it would be a stretch to say that either one of them could compete with any three of those legends.
SF: So, if I wouldn’t pay money to see those great fights, why would I shell out a couple bucks to watch a couple fighters who couldn’t carry their jockstrap?
Me: Actually, it will probably be more like $50.
SF: $50! To watch a fight between a two great fighters! No wonder I never hear of these guys. How many people actually pay for these fights?
Me: Well, De La Hoya’s biggest pay per view fight was when he fought Trinidad. 1.4 million paid for that.
SF: Ha! Sounds like a nice little campfire.
Me: What do you mean?
SF: Well about 140 million watched Peyton Manning win his first super bowl in February. Assuming both Peyton and Oscar are both equals in terms of where they stand with their respected sports, about a 100 times more people are watching Peyton than are watching Oscar. No wonder the whole world has heard of one and not the other.
Me: You have a good point.
SF: It doesn’t stop there. In October I watched Albert Pujols and the St. Louis Cardinals win the World Series for free. Last June I watched Shaquille O’Neal and the Miami Heat win the NBA championship for free. Last summer I watched Italy win the world cup for free. Almost any weekend I can watch Tiger Woods or Roger Federer for free. What makes boxing so special that I have to pay for it?
Me: I have no idea. Maybe because it’s fun to watch?
SF: It is fun, but so are all those other sports I mentioned. It doesn’t mean I have to pay for it. Heck, all my uncles remember watching guys like Sugar Ray Robinson, Joe Louis and Rocky Marciano while growing up. They were the best of their time and no one had to pay to watch them. Yet here we are 50 years later, and you can pretty much talk to anyone about these fighters. In 50 years are people going to be talking about De La Hoya or Mayweather? No, because no one has ever heard of them. I was watching a show the other day and the guys were trying to compare Joe Montana with Tom Brady. That’s something everybody watched because everyone was familiar with the two guys who were being compared. Could you imagine a show comparing Sugar Ray Leonard and Floyd Mayweather? You may as well be comparing Leonard to Johnny Paycheck. Probably the only show you could do like that today is to compare Larry Holmes with whoever is the heavyweight champion right now. I’m guessing it’s either Lennox Lewis or Mike Tyson.
Me: Actually, I think it is Wladimir Klitschko, Oleg Maskaev, and Nikolay Valuev.
SF: There can only be one champ. Are there 3 super bowl winners every year, 3 World Series champs, 3 Masters winners, or 3 French Open champs every year?
Me: Ok, If you had to pick one it would probably be Wladimir.
SF: Good, because I’ve never heard of the other guys. In fact the only time I can remember seeing Wladimir is when he did a stupid human trick on David Letterman. Or maybe it was Jay Leno. I can’t remember. Anyways, that’s pretty pathetic. I remember when champs like Muhammad Ali and Evander Holyfield used to appear on shows pretty regularly. Now all the heavyweight champ is good for is a stupid human trick. My how the sport has fallen.
Me: Can’t argue with that.
SF: Here’s my stop, maybe we can talk some other time when you ride the bus. Later.
Me: See ya.
Well, here I stand today once again at the bus stop waiting for the bus. Waiting, waiting, waiting. Oh good. Here it comes. Hopefully this time I’ll sit next to someone who’s not such a wet blanket, unlike the last time. Huh, that guy sitting six rows back on the left looks pretty cool. I’ll give him a shot.
Me: What’s up, man? Mind if I sit here?
Cool Guy (CG): No, go ahead.
Me: Thanks. Whatcha lookin’ at?
CG: Oh, I didn’t have time to read the upcoming boxing schedule online, so I printed it out before running to catch the bus.
Me: You’re a boxing fan?! Cool, so am I.
CG: Right on. How long have you been a fan?
Me: Well, I’ve followed the sport for as long as I can remember, but I’ve been a fan since April 15th, 1985.
CG: Ah, The War.
Me: You got it.
CG: Yeah, that was one of the rare times in which the fight exceeded the hype.
Me: Absolutely incredible. It was one of the few times in which the guys calling the fight lost control of themselves while calling a sporting event. When Hearns almost decapitated Hagler in the first 30 seconds of the fight, I thought Bernstein was going to have a heart attack. Pretty exciting. The only other time I can think of that happening was when Tiger sank that chip shot at the Masters a few years ago.
CG: Unfortunately you don’t see that much anymore. There doesn’t seem to be very many inspiring boxers out there today.
Me: What do you mean?
CG: Well, take the other night in Memphis for example. Jermain Taylor fought Cory Spinks for his middleweight title, a fight that pretty much nobody wanted to see. After winning a somewhat close decision, I’m not sure why anyone would want to see him fight again.
Me: Why’s that?
CG: Well Spinks is a very good fighter, but not much of a puncher. He’s only knocked out 11 guys in 36 victories. Not to mention the fact that most of those fights have been at the welterweight level. He’s basically a poor man’s Pernell Whitaker. In fact, if Whitaker 13 years ago had been in the ring against Taylor, Sweet Pea would be wearing the middleweight crown.
Me: OK, so what’s your point. I thought we were talking about inspiring boxers.
CG: Well that’s just it. Taylor isn’t very inspiring. Since winning two very close decisions against Bernard Hopkins and a controversial decision against Winky Wright, he’s decisioned two second tier fighters in Kassim Ouma and Cory Spinks. Meanwhile, guys like Felix Strum, Arthur Abraham, and Kelly Pavlik are waiting out there. He claims the money isn’t right, and I’m beginning to think he isn’t right. If he and Lou Dibella want to settle a fraction of the money for fighting guys who are relative cream puffs, then they can have a blast.
Me: That’s ridiculous. He’ll only fight the best fighters available if the money is right? I thought you were supposed to go up against the best, and then the money followed. That’s the way it works in all the other sports out there. Can you imagine the Indianapolis colts saying they won’t play the Chicago Bears in the super bowl until the money is right?
CG: That’s what he said Saturday night. On the undercard of his fight against Spinks, Kelly Pavlik was very impressive in knocking out top contender Edison Miranda. When asked after the fight if he’d be willing to fight Pavlik, he responded with, "If the money is right." When Larry Merchant pressed him on the issue, he admitted that he wouldn’t fight him if the money wasn’t right. It doesn’t sound very promising considering the fact that the money hasn’t been right for any of the other top fighters out there. If all he cares about is money, then Oscar De La Hoya is probably the best fight available for him out there.
Me: Yikes, I hope that doesn’t happen.
CG: Me, too. But that’s the path he appears to be taking.
Me: Who else out there do you not think is very impressive?
CG: None other than the great Floyd Mayweather.
Me: You sound sarcastic. Don’t you think Mayweather is great?
CG: Absolutely. He is without question one of the top 5 fighters out there pound for pound.
Me: Why the sarcasm then?
CG: In my opinion he has had a very safe, calculated career relative to his supposive skill level. In doing so, he has been very arrogant and brash.
Me: What do you mean by safe?
CG: Throughout his entire career he hasn’t taken fight in which it wasn’t assumed that he would win. When he was a junior lightweight champion and Shane Mosely was the lightweight champ, Mosely offered him a fight. Mayweather refused, claiming he wanted to break Joe Louis’ record for title defenses. I don’t think it came as any surprise that as soon as Mosely decided to move up to Welterweight, Mayweather lost interest in breaking Louis’ record and decided to move up to lightweight. Once he did, it was pretty clear why he didn’t want to fight Mosely. He had two fights in which he narrowly beat the legendary Jose Luis Castillo.
Me: Who?
CG: Exactly. Then after beating fringe contenders Victoriano Sosa and Phillip N’Dou, he moved up to Junior Welterweight.
Me: Wow, he really cleaned up that division. The cream of the crop. He must have at least fought the top fighter in the next one up. There are a lot of top fighters in that division.
CG: Mayweather seems to have a knack for being able to not do that, though. His title shot was against DeMarcus Corley, who he decisioned, and he defended against Henry Bruseles and Arturo Gatti. Corley had lost to Judah in his previous fight and Arturo Gatti kind of speaks for itself.
Me: Yeah, Gatti is a lot of fun to watch because he’s got guts, but he’s hardly a top fighter. I’d call him a rich man’s Tommy Cordova.
CG: That sounds about right.
Me: Are you trying to tell me he went through the junior welterweight division without fighting guys like Kostya Tszyu or Miguel Cotto?
CG: That seems to be Mayweather’s gift.
Me: OK, so he moved up to welterweight. There are a lot of tough fighters there. Did he fight any of them?
CG: I’m not going to tell you that they aren’t good fighters, because they are. Once again, though, he played it safe. He decisioned Zab Judah for the title, the same Zab Judah who couldn’t last two rounds with Kostya Tszyu. Then he decisioned Carlos Baldomir, who isn’t a bad fighter. He does have 10 losses in his career, and has scored 13 knockouts in 43 victories. I guess you could call him a Hispanic, poor man’s Cory Spinks.
Me: Wow. So he didn’t want anything to do with Mosely, Margarito, or Williams?
CG: Apparently not. Then of course he beat a way-past-his-prime Oscar De La Hoya earlier this month.
Me: Do you think Oscar’s best days are behind him?
CG: Oh yeah. He’s only had two fights in the last 2 ½ years. He’s still a pretty good fighter, but he has too many pokers in the fire to be anything close to what he used to be. Even before Mayweather fought him, I’m not sure he was even one of the top 5 junior middleweights out there. It was a very safe and easy fight for Mayweather that pretty much guaranteed the biggest payoff for the least reward.
Me: That is a pretty boring career. His uncle, Roger, has fought tougher fights that he has.
CG: Not only that, but the guy isn’t exactly a class act.
Me: What do you mean?
CG: He basically just says a lot of stupid things. I read recently that while he was hanging out with his best friend, $.50, he said something to the effect that if you don’t like him (meaning Mayweather), then you must not like money.
Me: That’s a lot of peer pressure. I’m really tempted to like him.
CG: The worst was how he recently tried putting down Shane Mosely. Last summer after Shane knocked out Fernando Vargas, he stated in an interview that he promised his wife that he wouldn’t fight anymore for the rest of the year. Well, Mayweather decided to run his mouth recently and in the process he made it clear that if he wants to fight Mosely he’ll call his wife because that’s who controls Shane.
Me: That’s ridiculous that he’d draw that kind of conclusion. I think anyone who heard what Shane said last summer regarding his wife could easily tell it was not in a submissive tone. Not only that, but Mayweather is probably the last person who should be talking about fighting Shane since he’s made it clear his whole career that he wants nothing to do with him.
CG: Like I said, there really isn’t a whole lot that is interesting about either of these guys. I really wish they’d both retire. Both of them have made plenty of money and neither one has gotten seriously hurt in the ring. They should just hang it up and make room for the guys who just show up and fight.
Me: Let’s say these guys both keep fighting. What kind of career do you think they should pursue?
CG: They should settle for nothing but the best. Pretty much all the great fighters in the last 10-15 years have settled for nothing but the best. I’ll run down some of them. Pernell Whitaker took on all the great ones. He fought Julio Cesar Chavez, Buddy McGirt (twice), Oscar De La Hoya, Julio Cesar Vasquez, and Felix Trinidad. In most of those fights he was not favored, and the only one I think he lost was to Trinidad. In addition to Whitaker, Oscar De La Hoya fought Ike Quartey, Felix Trinidad, Shane Mosely (twice), Fernando Vargas, Felix Sturm, and Bernard Hopkins. I really gained a lot respect for Oscar when he fought Hopkins. I think pretty much everyone knew he didn’t have a chance against him, especially after he really struggled against Sturm. Sure enough, B-Hop knocked him out in the 9th round. Shane Mosely’s career has really impressed me. In addition to fighting Oscar twice, he’s also fought Vernon Forrest twice and Winky Wright twice. Keep in mind he turned down a lot of money from De La Hoya to fight Winky for much less money. The reason he gave was because he wants to fight the best, and Winky is the best. Bernard Hopkins has fought…..
Me: OK, I get the point. Both those guys have had very boring and unexciting careers relative to their peers whom they probably believe they should be included with. Obviously Taylor and Mayweather have fallen short of achieving greatness compared to those other guys.
CG: That’s basically the point I was trying to make. As talented as those guys are, they can never really be considered great. While an argument can certainly be made that Mayweather is better than Whitaker, or that Taylor is better than Hagler and/or Hopkins, the reality is that they can’t be mentioned in the same sentence because of the path their careers have taken up to this point.
Me: That’s a bummer, but I can’t argue with that.
CG: That what it sounds like to me, too. Hey, this is my stop. Maybe we can get together and watch Hagler-Hearns sometime. We can travel back to the time when boxing was about showing you’re the best instead of saying it.
Me: That sounds great. See ya.
To boot, HBO is featuring this fight. They are, without question, the standard in which the boxing world is judged. If you're fighting on HBO, then you are the best. That's pretty disgusting.
If either of these guys were to fight any of the top fighters in their respective divisions they would not last the distance. Pavlik would have Trinidad out of there inside of 3 rounds, and Jones wouldn't last 10 rounds with Dawson. For the record, Jones is bigger, stronger, and faster than Trinidad. The fight will end whenever Roy wants it to end.
Anyone who knows me is aware of how disgusted I am with the entire orgination of the sport. Below are a couple of ficticious conversations I wrote 7-8 months ago expressing some of my frusterations. Since then, I have only become moreso.
I was riding the bus recently, and had a fascinating conversation with an average sports fan. If I had to guess, I’d say some of you will probably have a hard time believing this conversation ever took place for several reasons. The first of course is that I never ride the bus. Second of all I would imagine most of you would find it hard to believe that we would have so many facts memorized during the course of this conversation. And lastly, most of the people reading this probably know that I’m an introvert for the most part and that even if I was riding a bus it isn’t very likely that I’d really talk to anyone. I’m sure some of you could probably think of a few other reasons as well. Anyways, here it is!
Me: Hey, man. Do you mind if I sit here?
Sports Fan (SF): Go right ahead.
Me: Oh, you’re reading the sports section. Do you like sports?
SF: Yes I do. I’m too busy to follow it too closely, but I enjoy watching pretty much any sports event that’s on TV.
Me: Are you looking forward to the De La Hoya – Mayweather fight in May?
SF: Didn’t know they were fighting. I doubt I’ll watch it. Isn’t Mayweather getting old? I remember watching him fight Julio Cesar Chavez (CBS) and Pernell Whitaker (ABC) about 20 years ago.
Me: No, you’re thinking of his uncle, Roger. He hung up the gloves about 7-8 years ago. De La Hoya is fighting his nephew, Pretty Boy Floyd.
SF: I’ve never heard of him. Who has he fought recently?
Me: Well, he fought Carlos Baldomir last November on HBO and Zab Judah about a year ago on pay per view.
SF: That’s probably why I’ve never heard of him. I don’t pay to watch boxing. Especially if I’ve never heard of them. Who’s the guy he’s fighting, De La Hoya? His first name is Oscar, right?
Me: Yes it is.
SF: I haven’t heard anything about him in years. I watched him win a gold medal in Barcelona, some of his early fights on ESPN. It seems like I remember him fighting some guy in Stateline, Nevada on ABC. The reason I remember it is because you could see Bruce Willis sitting ringside the whole fight. What’s he done since then?
Me: Well, he’s had a pretty solid career. He’s beaten a lot good fighters like Pernell Whitaker, Julio Cesar Chavez, Ike Quartey, Fernando Vargas, and Felix Strum. He’s lost some controversial fights to Shane Mosely and Felix Trinidad. Of course a lot of people, including myself, didn’t think he beat Whitaker or Strum. He did get knocked out by Bernard Hopkins, though.
SF: My goodness! I can’t believe missed all of his fights! What channel were they on?
Me: Uh, they were all on pay per view.
SF: Man, what is it with all these fights suddenly being on pay per view? I remember watching a lot of great fights on network TV. I’m pretty sure I saw both Leonard-Duran fights on ABC, Tommy Hearns and Duran fought on CBS. De La Hoya and Mayweather can’t be any better than those fighters can they?
Me: No, it would be a stretch to say that either one of them could compete with any three of those legends.
SF: So, if I wouldn’t pay money to see those great fights, why would I shell out a couple bucks to watch a couple fighters who couldn’t carry their jockstrap?
Me: Actually, it will probably be more like $50.
SF: $50! To watch a fight between a two great fighters! No wonder I never hear of these guys. How many people actually pay for these fights?
Me: Well, De La Hoya’s biggest pay per view fight was when he fought Trinidad. 1.4 million paid for that.
SF: Ha! Sounds like a nice little campfire.
Me: What do you mean?
SF: Well about 140 million watched Peyton Manning win his first super bowl in February. Assuming both Peyton and Oscar are both equals in terms of where they stand with their respected sports, about a 100 times more people are watching Peyton than are watching Oscar. No wonder the whole world has heard of one and not the other.
Me: You have a good point.
SF: It doesn’t stop there. In October I watched Albert Pujols and the St. Louis Cardinals win the World Series for free. Last June I watched Shaquille O’Neal and the Miami Heat win the NBA championship for free. Last summer I watched Italy win the world cup for free. Almost any weekend I can watch Tiger Woods or Roger Federer for free. What makes boxing so special that I have to pay for it?
Me: I have no idea. Maybe because it’s fun to watch?
SF: It is fun, but so are all those other sports I mentioned. It doesn’t mean I have to pay for it. Heck, all my uncles remember watching guys like Sugar Ray Robinson, Joe Louis and Rocky Marciano while growing up. They were the best of their time and no one had to pay to watch them. Yet here we are 50 years later, and you can pretty much talk to anyone about these fighters. In 50 years are people going to be talking about De La Hoya or Mayweather? No, because no one has ever heard of them. I was watching a show the other day and the guys were trying to compare Joe Montana with Tom Brady. That’s something everybody watched because everyone was familiar with the two guys who were being compared. Could you imagine a show comparing Sugar Ray Leonard and Floyd Mayweather? You may as well be comparing Leonard to Johnny Paycheck. Probably the only show you could do like that today is to compare Larry Holmes with whoever is the heavyweight champion right now. I’m guessing it’s either Lennox Lewis or Mike Tyson.
Me: Actually, I think it is Wladimir Klitschko, Oleg Maskaev, and Nikolay Valuev.
SF: There can only be one champ. Are there 3 super bowl winners every year, 3 World Series champs, 3 Masters winners, or 3 French Open champs every year?
Me: Ok, If you had to pick one it would probably be Wladimir.
SF: Good, because I’ve never heard of the other guys. In fact the only time I can remember seeing Wladimir is when he did a stupid human trick on David Letterman. Or maybe it was Jay Leno. I can’t remember. Anyways, that’s pretty pathetic. I remember when champs like Muhammad Ali and Evander Holyfield used to appear on shows pretty regularly. Now all the heavyweight champ is good for is a stupid human trick. My how the sport has fallen.
Me: Can’t argue with that.
SF: Here’s my stop, maybe we can talk some other time when you ride the bus. Later.
Me: See ya.
Well, here I stand today once again at the bus stop waiting for the bus. Waiting, waiting, waiting. Oh good. Here it comes. Hopefully this time I’ll sit next to someone who’s not such a wet blanket, unlike the last time. Huh, that guy sitting six rows back on the left looks pretty cool. I’ll give him a shot.
Me: What’s up, man? Mind if I sit here?
Cool Guy (CG): No, go ahead.
Me: Thanks. Whatcha lookin’ at?
CG: Oh, I didn’t have time to read the upcoming boxing schedule online, so I printed it out before running to catch the bus.
Me: You’re a boxing fan?! Cool, so am I.
CG: Right on. How long have you been a fan?
Me: Well, I’ve followed the sport for as long as I can remember, but I’ve been a fan since April 15th, 1985.
CG: Ah, The War.
Me: You got it.
CG: Yeah, that was one of the rare times in which the fight exceeded the hype.
Me: Absolutely incredible. It was one of the few times in which the guys calling the fight lost control of themselves while calling a sporting event. When Hearns almost decapitated Hagler in the first 30 seconds of the fight, I thought Bernstein was going to have a heart attack. Pretty exciting. The only other time I can think of that happening was when Tiger sank that chip shot at the Masters a few years ago.
CG: Unfortunately you don’t see that much anymore. There doesn’t seem to be very many inspiring boxers out there today.
Me: What do you mean?
CG: Well, take the other night in Memphis for example. Jermain Taylor fought Cory Spinks for his middleweight title, a fight that pretty much nobody wanted to see. After winning a somewhat close decision, I’m not sure why anyone would want to see him fight again.
Me: Why’s that?
CG: Well Spinks is a very good fighter, but not much of a puncher. He’s only knocked out 11 guys in 36 victories. Not to mention the fact that most of those fights have been at the welterweight level. He’s basically a poor man’s Pernell Whitaker. In fact, if Whitaker 13 years ago had been in the ring against Taylor, Sweet Pea would be wearing the middleweight crown.
Me: OK, so what’s your point. I thought we were talking about inspiring boxers.
CG: Well that’s just it. Taylor isn’t very inspiring. Since winning two very close decisions against Bernard Hopkins and a controversial decision against Winky Wright, he’s decisioned two second tier fighters in Kassim Ouma and Cory Spinks. Meanwhile, guys like Felix Strum, Arthur Abraham, and Kelly Pavlik are waiting out there. He claims the money isn’t right, and I’m beginning to think he isn’t right. If he and Lou Dibella want to settle a fraction of the money for fighting guys who are relative cream puffs, then they can have a blast.
Me: That’s ridiculous. He’ll only fight the best fighters available if the money is right? I thought you were supposed to go up against the best, and then the money followed. That’s the way it works in all the other sports out there. Can you imagine the Indianapolis colts saying they won’t play the Chicago Bears in the super bowl until the money is right?
CG: That’s what he said Saturday night. On the undercard of his fight against Spinks, Kelly Pavlik was very impressive in knocking out top contender Edison Miranda. When asked after the fight if he’d be willing to fight Pavlik, he responded with, "If the money is right." When Larry Merchant pressed him on the issue, he admitted that he wouldn’t fight him if the money wasn’t right. It doesn’t sound very promising considering the fact that the money hasn’t been right for any of the other top fighters out there. If all he cares about is money, then Oscar De La Hoya is probably the best fight available for him out there.
Me: Yikes, I hope that doesn’t happen.
CG: Me, too. But that’s the path he appears to be taking.
Me: Who else out there do you not think is very impressive?
CG: None other than the great Floyd Mayweather.
Me: You sound sarcastic. Don’t you think Mayweather is great?
CG: Absolutely. He is without question one of the top 5 fighters out there pound for pound.
Me: Why the sarcasm then?
CG: In my opinion he has had a very safe, calculated career relative to his supposive skill level. In doing so, he has been very arrogant and brash.
Me: What do you mean by safe?
CG: Throughout his entire career he hasn’t taken fight in which it wasn’t assumed that he would win. When he was a junior lightweight champion and Shane Mosely was the lightweight champ, Mosely offered him a fight. Mayweather refused, claiming he wanted to break Joe Louis’ record for title defenses. I don’t think it came as any surprise that as soon as Mosely decided to move up to Welterweight, Mayweather lost interest in breaking Louis’ record and decided to move up to lightweight. Once he did, it was pretty clear why he didn’t want to fight Mosely. He had two fights in which he narrowly beat the legendary Jose Luis Castillo.
Me: Who?
CG: Exactly. Then after beating fringe contenders Victoriano Sosa and Phillip N’Dou, he moved up to Junior Welterweight.
Me: Wow, he really cleaned up that division. The cream of the crop. He must have at least fought the top fighter in the next one up. There are a lot of top fighters in that division.
CG: Mayweather seems to have a knack for being able to not do that, though. His title shot was against DeMarcus Corley, who he decisioned, and he defended against Henry Bruseles and Arturo Gatti. Corley had lost to Judah in his previous fight and Arturo Gatti kind of speaks for itself.
Me: Yeah, Gatti is a lot of fun to watch because he’s got guts, but he’s hardly a top fighter. I’d call him a rich man’s Tommy Cordova.
CG: That sounds about right.
Me: Are you trying to tell me he went through the junior welterweight division without fighting guys like Kostya Tszyu or Miguel Cotto?
CG: That seems to be Mayweather’s gift.
Me: OK, so he moved up to welterweight. There are a lot of tough fighters there. Did he fight any of them?
CG: I’m not going to tell you that they aren’t good fighters, because they are. Once again, though, he played it safe. He decisioned Zab Judah for the title, the same Zab Judah who couldn’t last two rounds with Kostya Tszyu. Then he decisioned Carlos Baldomir, who isn’t a bad fighter. He does have 10 losses in his career, and has scored 13 knockouts in 43 victories. I guess you could call him a Hispanic, poor man’s Cory Spinks.
Me: Wow. So he didn’t want anything to do with Mosely, Margarito, or Williams?
CG: Apparently not. Then of course he beat a way-past-his-prime Oscar De La Hoya earlier this month.
Me: Do you think Oscar’s best days are behind him?
CG: Oh yeah. He’s only had two fights in the last 2 ½ years. He’s still a pretty good fighter, but he has too many pokers in the fire to be anything close to what he used to be. Even before Mayweather fought him, I’m not sure he was even one of the top 5 junior middleweights out there. It was a very safe and easy fight for Mayweather that pretty much guaranteed the biggest payoff for the least reward.
Me: That is a pretty boring career. His uncle, Roger, has fought tougher fights that he has.
CG: Not only that, but the guy isn’t exactly a class act.
Me: What do you mean?
CG: He basically just says a lot of stupid things. I read recently that while he was hanging out with his best friend, $.50, he said something to the effect that if you don’t like him (meaning Mayweather), then you must not like money.
Me: That’s a lot of peer pressure. I’m really tempted to like him.
CG: The worst was how he recently tried putting down Shane Mosely. Last summer after Shane knocked out Fernando Vargas, he stated in an interview that he promised his wife that he wouldn’t fight anymore for the rest of the year. Well, Mayweather decided to run his mouth recently and in the process he made it clear that if he wants to fight Mosely he’ll call his wife because that’s who controls Shane.
Me: That’s ridiculous that he’d draw that kind of conclusion. I think anyone who heard what Shane said last summer regarding his wife could easily tell it was not in a submissive tone. Not only that, but Mayweather is probably the last person who should be talking about fighting Shane since he’s made it clear his whole career that he wants nothing to do with him.
CG: Like I said, there really isn’t a whole lot that is interesting about either of these guys. I really wish they’d both retire. Both of them have made plenty of money and neither one has gotten seriously hurt in the ring. They should just hang it up and make room for the guys who just show up and fight.
Me: Let’s say these guys both keep fighting. What kind of career do you think they should pursue?
CG: They should settle for nothing but the best. Pretty much all the great fighters in the last 10-15 years have settled for nothing but the best. I’ll run down some of them. Pernell Whitaker took on all the great ones. He fought Julio Cesar Chavez, Buddy McGirt (twice), Oscar De La Hoya, Julio Cesar Vasquez, and Felix Trinidad. In most of those fights he was not favored, and the only one I think he lost was to Trinidad. In addition to Whitaker, Oscar De La Hoya fought Ike Quartey, Felix Trinidad, Shane Mosely (twice), Fernando Vargas, Felix Sturm, and Bernard Hopkins. I really gained a lot respect for Oscar when he fought Hopkins. I think pretty much everyone knew he didn’t have a chance against him, especially after he really struggled against Sturm. Sure enough, B-Hop knocked him out in the 9th round. Shane Mosely’s career has really impressed me. In addition to fighting Oscar twice, he’s also fought Vernon Forrest twice and Winky Wright twice. Keep in mind he turned down a lot of money from De La Hoya to fight Winky for much less money. The reason he gave was because he wants to fight the best, and Winky is the best. Bernard Hopkins has fought…..
Me: OK, I get the point. Both those guys have had very boring and unexciting careers relative to their peers whom they probably believe they should be included with. Obviously Taylor and Mayweather have fallen short of achieving greatness compared to those other guys.
CG: That’s basically the point I was trying to make. As talented as those guys are, they can never really be considered great. While an argument can certainly be made that Mayweather is better than Whitaker, or that Taylor is better than Hagler and/or Hopkins, the reality is that they can’t be mentioned in the same sentence because of the path their careers have taken up to this point.
Me: That’s a bummer, but I can’t argue with that.
CG: That what it sounds like to me, too. Hey, this is my stop. Maybe we can get together and watch Hagler-Hearns sometime. We can travel back to the time when boxing was about showing you’re the best instead of saying it.
Me: That sounds great. See ya.
Saturday, December 22, 2007
What is the real issue?
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/story?id=4041041&page=1
I'm at risk being a celebrity gossip geek by even discussing this issue, but I'll admit to being a little caught off guard by the issues being discussed regarding Jamie Spears' pregnancy. While I agree with those who say it was irresponsible for her to get pregnant at this time (that of course is assumming that she is not preparring to sacrifice a portion of her career in order to raise her child), I'm more upset that there was even consideration given by both Spears and the media as to whether or not the babies life should be terminated as a result of this decision.
Now that she has decided to let the baby live, I'm going to be very curious as to what will happen in the long run. I'm certainly going to be praying for this child over the years. If I'm still around in 25 years, I look forward to what this child has to say regarding having his/her life weighed by the jury. One thing I certainly do not hope for is a guilt trip laid on the child for possibly ruining Spears career. They will probably have enough baggage as it stands.
I'm at risk being a celebrity gossip geek by even discussing this issue, but I'll admit to being a little caught off guard by the issues being discussed regarding Jamie Spears' pregnancy. While I agree with those who say it was irresponsible for her to get pregnant at this time (that of course is assumming that she is not preparring to sacrifice a portion of her career in order to raise her child), I'm more upset that there was even consideration given by both Spears and the media as to whether or not the babies life should be terminated as a result of this decision.
Now that she has decided to let the baby live, I'm going to be very curious as to what will happen in the long run. I'm certainly going to be praying for this child over the years. If I'm still around in 25 years, I look forward to what this child has to say regarding having his/her life weighed by the jury. One thing I certainly do not hope for is a guilt trip laid on the child for possibly ruining Spears career. They will probably have enough baggage as it stands.
Monday, December 17, 2007
All this talk about tonight is giving me a headache
I apologize in advance if topic resembles minutia in any way to the reader, but anyone who knows me is aware of the fact that I am easily annoyed by hypnotic trends that are accepted as the norm. Examples of this are things such as saying “you know” during a sentence, everyone laughing while watching a movie during a scene that they has seen numerous times in the trailer, and conversations about public figures (sports, entertainment, or politics) in which the person being discussed is cast in a negative light (Gale Sayers sucked, Rod Stewart can’t sing, or George Bush is stupid) despite the fact that relative to the rest of the world the exact opposite is true. This isn’t an attempt to portray myself as an elitist, as I’m as guilty as anyone else when it comes to committing these types of acts.
There is, however, one trend that has baffled me for years. I have no idea how it was started, but at some point it became popular to incorporate the word “tonight” into songs. In listening to many of the songs there is obviously an abundance of sexual reference in using the word (“Take Me Home Tonight!”). Many people, though, would be surprised to find that many uses have no sexual overtones whatsoever. In saying that, I won’t deny that some of the references that appear to be non-sexual may in fact be exactly that (Neither myself nor Frasier Crane have figured out how exactly we’re supposed to “Wang Chung” tonight). Obviously Richard & Linda Thompson can’t see the bright lights unless it is tonight (or any other night), so they’re excused. Solomon Linda gets somewhat of a free pass for claiming that the lion sleeps tonight. I’m a little reluctant do give one here because as everybody knows that lions sleep at least 20 hours a day, so this undoubtedly includes some daylight hours as well. Given the fact that the song was inspired by villagers who were terrified at night by a stalking lion, I’m willing to forgive and forget.
No sympathy whatsoever is given to Creedence Clearwater Revival for their song, “Hey Tonight,” in which they say the word with reckless abandon with no rhyme or reason. At my count, nearly 20% of the song is simply John Fogerty screaming, “Tonii-iiiight!” Inexcusable.
Without question, Phil Collins is the tonight king. He had a massive hit with his song, “In the Air Tonight.” Unfortunately as his career began to falter, he tried to resurrect it with song in which the title was so good he use it three times (“Tonight Tonight Tonight” in case you haven’t guessed). In addition to these songs, he also wrote, “Please Come Out Tonight,” “One More Night (which is about tonight),” and sang a cover of “The Way You Look Tonight.”
This is a trend that has even made its way into Christian Music. Both Jaci Velasquez and Jeremy Camp have songs titled “Tonight.” In Jeremy’s song, he sings about how he will take his cross. Of course I think this is great. I’m just not quite sure why he has to do it tonight.
Anyways, that’s about all I can handle on this subject. Please feel free to add or comment on this topic if you find it worthy. Nontheless, I hope you enjoy some of the videos I posted below. You’ll never guess what they’re about. Warning: They do contain some Boogie Woogie.
Genesis - Tonight Tonight Tonight
Phil Collins - In the Air Tonight
The Outfield - Your Love
New Kids On the Block - Tonight
Tokens - The Lion Sleeps Tonight
Jeremy Camp - Tonight
Jaci Velasquez - Tonight
Frank Sinatra - The Way You Look Tonight
Elton John - Can You Feel the Love Tonight
Creedence Clearwater Revival – Hey Tonight
Eddie Money - Take Me Home Tonight
Bryan Adams - Tonight
Elvis Presley- Are you Lonesome Tonight
The Smashing Pumpkins - Tonight, Tonight
Chris Daughtry - Feels Like Tonight
Van Halen - Feel Your Love Tonight
Cat Stevens - But I Might Die Tonight
Eagle-Eye Cherry - Save Tonight
Mariah Carey- After Tonight
Eric Clapton - Wonderful Tonight
Taylor Hicks - Give Me Tonight
Wang Chung - Everybody Have Fun Tonight
Whitney Houston-I'm Your Baby Tonight
Bob Seger - We've Got Tonight
New Order - Lonesome Tonight
Backstreet Boys - I Need You Tonight
Richard & Linda Thompson - I Want to See the Bright Lights
INXS - Need You Tonight
Cutting Crew - I Just Died in Your Arms Tonight
There is, however, one trend that has baffled me for years. I have no idea how it was started, but at some point it became popular to incorporate the word “tonight” into songs. In listening to many of the songs there is obviously an abundance of sexual reference in using the word (“Take Me Home Tonight!”). Many people, though, would be surprised to find that many uses have no sexual overtones whatsoever. In saying that, I won’t deny that some of the references that appear to be non-sexual may in fact be exactly that (Neither myself nor Frasier Crane have figured out how exactly we’re supposed to “Wang Chung” tonight). Obviously Richard & Linda Thompson can’t see the bright lights unless it is tonight (or any other night), so they’re excused. Solomon Linda gets somewhat of a free pass for claiming that the lion sleeps tonight. I’m a little reluctant do give one here because as everybody knows that lions sleep at least 20 hours a day, so this undoubtedly includes some daylight hours as well. Given the fact that the song was inspired by villagers who were terrified at night by a stalking lion, I’m willing to forgive and forget.
No sympathy whatsoever is given to Creedence Clearwater Revival for their song, “Hey Tonight,” in which they say the word with reckless abandon with no rhyme or reason. At my count, nearly 20% of the song is simply John Fogerty screaming, “Tonii-iiiight!” Inexcusable.
Without question, Phil Collins is the tonight king. He had a massive hit with his song, “In the Air Tonight.” Unfortunately as his career began to falter, he tried to resurrect it with song in which the title was so good he use it three times (“Tonight Tonight Tonight” in case you haven’t guessed). In addition to these songs, he also wrote, “Please Come Out Tonight,” “One More Night (which is about tonight),” and sang a cover of “The Way You Look Tonight.”
This is a trend that has even made its way into Christian Music. Both Jaci Velasquez and Jeremy Camp have songs titled “Tonight.” In Jeremy’s song, he sings about how he will take his cross. Of course I think this is great. I’m just not quite sure why he has to do it tonight.
Anyways, that’s about all I can handle on this subject. Please feel free to add or comment on this topic if you find it worthy. Nontheless, I hope you enjoy some of the videos I posted below. You’ll never guess what they’re about. Warning: They do contain some Boogie Woogie.
Genesis - Tonight Tonight Tonight
Phil Collins - In the Air Tonight
The Outfield - Your Love
New Kids On the Block - Tonight
Tokens - The Lion Sleeps Tonight
Jeremy Camp - Tonight
Jaci Velasquez - Tonight
Frank Sinatra - The Way You Look Tonight
Elton John - Can You Feel the Love Tonight
Creedence Clearwater Revival – Hey Tonight
Eddie Money - Take Me Home Tonight
Bryan Adams - Tonight
Elvis Presley- Are you Lonesome Tonight
The Smashing Pumpkins - Tonight, Tonight
Chris Daughtry - Feels Like Tonight
Van Halen - Feel Your Love Tonight
Cat Stevens - But I Might Die Tonight
Eagle-Eye Cherry - Save Tonight
Mariah Carey- After Tonight
Eric Clapton - Wonderful Tonight
Taylor Hicks - Give Me Tonight
Wang Chung - Everybody Have Fun Tonight
Whitney Houston-I'm Your Baby Tonight
Bob Seger - We've Got Tonight
New Order - Lonesome Tonight
Backstreet Boys - I Need You Tonight
Richard & Linda Thompson - I Want to See the Bright Lights
INXS - Need You Tonight
Cutting Crew - I Just Died in Your Arms Tonight
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
